Free sample · PDF, 4 pages
A sample EB-1A petition with an exhibit cite on every sentence
Two criterion sections drafted by Immigration Copilot for a fictional computational biologist, Dr. Hana Tanaka. Read it the way an officer would: check any sentence against the exhibit it cites.
What is inside
- Criterion 5 (original contributions): accuracy benchmark, industry adoption, downloads and citations, each tied to an exhibit
- Criterion 6 (scholarly articles): three articles and the peer-review evidence for the journals they ran in
- Three open questions the draft sends back to the attorney instead of guessing
- One sentence removed before review because no exhibit supported it
- The exhibit list the cites point to, with page ranges across the binder
Dr. Tanaka designed StructureFold-3, which predicts protein structures at 94.3% TM-score accuracy on the CASP15 benchmarkEx. 14. Within a year of release, 47 pharmaceutical companies had adopted it in their drug-discovery pipelinesEx. 22, p. 6. Researchers downloaded the software 2,104,388 times in its first twelve monthsEx. 23.
Open question for the attorney: Ex. 15 gives the nine-week and three-week figures without dates or a named project.
Sample output for a fictional case. Not legal advice and not a template for a real petition.